A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency by Maria Vanina Martinez,Cristian Molinaro,V.S.

By Maria Vanina Martinez,Cristian Molinaro,V.S. Subrahmanian,Leila Amgoud

This SpringerBrief proposes a common framework for reasoning approximately inconsistency in a large choice of logics, together with inconsistency solution equipment that experience no longer but been studied.  The proposed framework permits clients to specify personal tastes on tips on how to get to the bottom of inconsistency whilst there are a number of how one can accomplish that. This empowers clients to solve inconsistency in information leveraging either their certain wisdom of the information in addition to their program wishes. The short exhibits that the framework is well-suited to deal with inconsistency in numerous logics, and gives algorithms to compute most well-liked recommendations. eventually, the short exhibits that the framework not just captures a number of current works, but additionally helps reasoning approximately inconsistency in different logics for which no such tools exist today.

Show description

Read Online or Download A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency (SpringerBriefs in Computer Science) PDF

Similar logic books

Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics: 327 (Synthese Library)

This booklet includes groundbreaking contributions to the philosophical research of mathematical perform. a number of philosophers of arithmetic have lately referred to as for an method of philosophy of arithmetic that will pay extra cognizance to mathematical perform. Questions pertaining to concept-formation, knowing, heuristics, alterations standard of reasoning, the position of analogies and diagrams, and so forth.

In Defence of Objective Bayesianism

How strongly in case you think a number of the propositions so that you can exhibit? that's the key query dealing with Bayesian epistemology. Subjective Bayesians carry that it truly is principally (though no longer completely) as much as the agent as to which levels of trust to undertake. aim Bayesians, nonetheless, hold that applicable levels of trust are principally (though no longer fullyyt) made up our minds via the agent's proof.

Language, Data, and Knowledge: First International Conference, LDK 2017, Galway, Ireland, June 19-20, 2017, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

This e-book constitutes the court cases of the 1st foreign convention on Language, information and data, LDK 2017, held in Galway, eire, in June 2017. The 14 complete papers and 19 brief papers integrated during this quantity have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from sixty eight preliminary submissions. They take care of language info; wisdom graphs; functions in NLP; and use instances in electronic humanities, social sciences, and BioNLP.

Database and Expert Systems Applications: 28th International Conference, DEXA 2017, Lyon, France, August 28-31, 2017, Proceedings, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

This quantity set LNCS 10438 and LNCS 10439 constitutes the refereed complaints of the twenty eighth overseas convention on Database and professional platforms functions, DEXA 2017, held in Lyon, France, August 2017. The 37 revised complete papers awarded including forty brief papers have been conscientiously reviewed and chosen from 166 submissions.

Extra info for A General Framework for Reasoning On Inconsistency (SpringerBriefs in Computer Science)

Sample text

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.99 of 5 – based on 46 votes